kevs-blog

Here I made this for you, whoever you are.


You’ve Been Told to Eat More. What if That’s Wrong?

Most of us grew up with the food pyramid, three square meals, and the idea that carbs were the enemy — or the saviour, depending on the decade. The truth, it turns out, is far less dramatic and a lot more interesting.

Here’s a question most people never seriously ask: how much food does a human body actually need? Not how much we enjoy eating. Not how much the packaging says is a serving. But genuinely, physiologically need.

The answer depends on who you are, what you do, and how hard you’re willing to challenge some deeply ingrained habits. Let’s get into it.

1. The myth of three meals a day

Breakfast, lunch, and dinner is not a biological imperative — it’s a social one. The three-meal structure became dominant during the industrial revolution, when factory shifts made structured eating practical. Before that, many cultures ate once or twice a day, largely based on when food was available.

Current research doesn’t point to a single “correct” number of meals. What matters far more is total caloric intake and the quality of what you’re eating. For most moderately active adults, the body handles two to four eating windows reasonably well. Some people genuinely thrive on intermittent fasting. Others feel foggy and irritable without regular meals. Neither camp is wrong — they just have different metabolic rhythms.

The takeaway: stop eating by the clock and start eating by your hunger cues. If you’re not hungry at 7am, you don’t have to eat at 7am. Your body will let you know.

“Meal frequency matters far less than total daily intake. For most people, eating two to four times per day is perfectly adequate — what’s in those meals is the real conversation.”

2. Protein, carbs, and fat — what your body is actually asking for

Here’s where things get practical. The three macronutrients each do something essential, and cutting any one of them out entirely is almost always a mistake.

Protein builds and repairs tissue. For a sedentary adult, roughly 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day is the commonly cited baseline. But most nutrition scientists now consider this a floor, not a target. Aiming for 1.2 to 1.6g/kg is more realistic for maintaining muscle mass, especially as we age.

Carbohydrates are your body’s preferred energy source — full stop. The demonisation of carbs over the past few decades is one of nutrition’s great missteps. Complex carbohydrates from whole grains, legumes, fruits, and vegetables provide sustained energy and fibre. They are not the enemy. Processed, refined carbs consumed in excess are worth limiting. That’s the actual distinction.

Fat is essential for hormone production, brain function, and absorbing fat-soluble vitamins. Healthy unsaturated fats — from olive oil, avocados, nuts, oily fish — should make up a meaningful portion of your diet. Saturated fat warrants moderation, and trans fats are best avoided entirely. But a diet that’s genuinely low in all fat is not a healthy diet.

PROTEIN

1.2–1.6g

per kg body weight

CARBS

45–65%

of total daily calories

FAT

20–35%

of total daily calories

3. What changes when you’re an athlete — take gymnastics

Gymnastics is a fascinating case study in athletic nutrition because it sits at an unusual intersection — explosive power, exceptional strength-to-weight ratio, endurance across long training sessions, and the kind of neuromuscular precision that demands a well-fuelled brain as much as a well-fuelled body.

A competitive gymnast training twice a day needs substantially more fuel than a sedentary office worker. Protein requirements climb to around 1.6 to 2.0g/kg to support muscle repair after high-impact training. Carbohydrate needs increase too — particularly around training windows — because glycogen stores are being depleted rapidly during floor routines, vaults, and bar work.

What makes gymnastics nutrition particularly nuanced is the cultural weight placed on body composition in the sport. Historically, gymnasts — especially young female athletes — have been underfed in the name of aesthetics, leading to injury, bone density loss, and hormonal disruption. The science is now clear: under-fuelling an athlete does not improve performance. It erodes it.

The right approach for any high-output athlete is periodised nutrition — eating more on heavy training days, slightly less on rest days, and timing intake around sessions to maximise recovery. Three meals a day is almost certainly not enough. For many elite gymnasts, five to six smaller, nutrient-dense meals keeps energy stable and supports the volume of work being asked of the body.

The bottom line

How much you need to eat is not a fixed number. It is a moving answer shaped by your age, activity level, body composition, and goals. What is fixed is this: your body needs adequate protein to maintain tissue, enough carbohydrate to power your brain and muscles, and sufficient healthy fat to keep your hormones and nervous system functioning properly.

Rigid meal schedules and macro-elimination diets are marketing, not medicine. The most useful thing you can do is learn to read your body — and make sure you’re giving it enough of the right things to actually do what you’re asking of it.

WANT MORE OF THIS?

Subscribe to get evidence-based nutrition, training, and health content — no fads, no fluff, no sponsored nonsense. Just the stuff that actually helps.

Leave a comment